Silicon Carbide (SiC) Fibers Market 2020 Growth, Size, Share, Trends Analysis And Forecast To 2025

Silicon Carbide (SiC) Fibers -Market Demand, Growth, Opportunities and Analysis Of Top Key Player Forecast To 2025

PUNE, MAHARASHTRA, INDIA, November 27, 2020 /EINPresswire.com/ — Silicon Carbide (SiC) Fibers Industry

Description

Wiseguyreports.Com Adds “Silicon Carbide (SiC) Fibers -Market Demand, Growth, Opportunities and Analysis Of Top Key Player Forecast To 2025” To Its Research Database

The research report includes specific segments by region (country), by company, by Type and by Application. This study provides information about the sales and revenue during the historic and forecasted period of 2015 to 2026. Understanding the segments helps in identifying the importance of different factors that aid the market growth.

The Silicon Carbide (SiC) Fibers market is analysed and market size information is provided by regions (countries). The report includes country-wise and region-wise market size for the period 2015-2026. It also includes market size and forecast by Type and by Application segment in terms of sales and revenue for the period 2015-2026.

This section of the report identifies various key manufacturers of the market. It helps the reader understand the strategies and collaborations that players are focusing on combat competition in the market. The comprehensive report provides a significant microscopic look at the market. The reader can identify the footprints of the manufacturers by knowing about the global revenue of manufacturers, the global price of manufacturers, and sales by manufacturers during the forecast period of 2015 to 2019.

The major players in global Silicon Carbide (SiC) Fibers market include:

NGS Advanced Fibers Co. Ltd.
COI Ceramics
Specialty Materials
Saint-Gobain
UBE Industries
Volzhsky Abrasive Works.
ACF
Nippon Carbon
SGL Group

Request For Sample Report @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/sample-request/6083904-global-silicon-carbide-sic-fibers-market-outlook-2021

Segment by Type, the Silicon Carbide (SiC) Fibers market is segmented into
Continuous Silicon Carbide (SiC) Fibers
Silicon Carbide Short Fibers

Segment by Application
Aerospace & Defense
Energy & Power
Industrial
Others

The key regions covered in the Silicon Carbide (SiC) Fibers market report are:
North America
U.S.
Canada
Europe
Germany
France
U.K.
Italy
Russia
Asia-Pacific
China
Japan
South Korea
India
Australia
Taiwan
Indonesia
Thailand
Malaysia
Philippines
Vietnam
Latin America
Mexico
Brazil
Argentina
Middle East & Africa
Turkey
Saudi Arabia
U.A.E

Leave a Query @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/enquiry/6083904-global-silicon-carbide-sic-fibers-market-outlook-2021

Table of Content

1 Silicon Carbide (SiC) Fibers Market Overview
1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Silicon Carbide (SiC) Fibers
1.2 Silicon Carbide (SiC) Fibers Segment by Type
1.2.1 Global Silicon Carbide (SiC) Fibers Sales Growth Rate Comparison by Type (2021-2026)
1.2.2 Continuous Silicon Carbide (SiC) Fibers
1.2.3 Silicon Carbide Short Fibers
1.3 Silicon Carbide (SiC) Fibers Segment by Application
1.3.1 Silicon Carbide (SiC) Fibers Sales Comparison by Application: 2020 VS 2026
1.3.2 Aerospace & Defense
1.3.3 Energy & Power
1.3.4 Industrial
1.3.5 Others
1.4 Global Silicon Carbide (SiC) Fibers Market Size Estimates and Forecasts
1.4.1 Global Silicon Carbide (SiC) Fibers Revenue 2015-2026
1.4.2 Global Silicon Carbide (SiC) Fibers Sales 2015-2026
1.4.3 Silicon Carbide (SiC) Fibers Market Size by Region: 2020 Versus 2026
1.5 Silicon Carbide (SiC) Fibers Industry
1.6 Silicon Carbide (SiC) Fibers Market Trends

2 Global Silicon Carbide (SiC) Fibers Market Competition by Manufacturers

….

6 Company Profiles and Key Figures in Silicon Carbide (SiC) Fibers Business
6.1 NGS Advanced Fibers Co. Ltd.
6.1.1 Corporation Information
6.1.2 NGS Advanced Fibers Co. Ltd. Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue
6.1.3 NGS Advanced Fibers Co. Ltd. Silicon Carbide (SiC) Fibers Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020)
6.1.4 NGS Advanced Fibers Co. Ltd. Products Offered
6.1.5 NGS Advanced Fibers Co. Ltd. Recent Development
6.2 COI Ceramics
6.2.1 COI Ceramics Corporation Information
6.2.2 COI Ceramics Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue
6.2.3 COI Ceramics Silicon Carbide (SiC) Fibers Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020)
6.2.4 COI Ceramics Products Offered
6.2.5 COI Ceramics Recent Development
6.3 Specialty Materials
6.3.1 Specialty Materials Corporation Information
6.3.2 Specialty Materials Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue
6.3.3 Specialty Materials Silicon Carbide (SiC) Fibers Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020)
6.3.4 Specialty Materials Products Offered
6.3.5 Specialty Materials Recent Development
6.4 Saint-Gobain
6.4.1 Saint-Gobain Corporation Information
6.4.2 Saint-Gobain Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue
6.4.3 Saint-Gobain Silicon Carbide (SiC) Fibers Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020)
6.4.4 Saint-Gobain Products Offered
6.4.5 Saint-Gobain Recent Development
6.5 UBE Industries
6.5.1 UBE Industries Corporation Information
6.5.2 UBE Industries Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue
6.5.3 UBE Industries Silicon Carbide (SiC) Fibers Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020)
6.5.4 UBE Industries Products Offered
6.5.5 UBE Industries Recent Development
6.6 Volzhsky Abrasive Works.
6.6.1 Volzhsky Abrasive Works. Corporation Information
6.6.2 Volzhsky Abrasive Works. Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue
6.6.3 Volzhsky Abrasive Works. Silicon Carbide (SiC) Fibers Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020)
6.6.4 Volzhsky Abrasive Works. Products Offered
6.6.5 Volzhsky Abrasive Works. Recent Development

6.7 ACF

6.8 Nippon Carbon

6.9 SGL Group

Buy Now @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/checkout?currency=one_user-USD&report_id=6083904

Continued…           

Contact Us: Sales@Wiseguyreports.com Ph: +1-646-845-9349 (Us)  Ph: +44 208 133 9349 (Uk)

NORAH TRENT
WISE GUY RESEARCH CONSULTANTS PVT LTD
646-845-9349
email us here


Source: EIN Presswire

COVID-19 hits trust and hope

Echo Research’s latest report “About Trust and Expectations in the Time of COVID-19” is now available to download.

LONDON, UNITED KINGDOM, November 26, 2020 /EINPresswire.com/ — COVID-19 has dented the general public’s perceptions of trust in the US and the UK. While down on 2019, some 65% of people still trust small businesses, way ahead of Government which remains at a consistently low 32%, according to a special study conducted by Echo Research on trust and expectations.

Echo Research, conducted an integrated study of trust and expectations amid the coronavirus pandemic that consisted of 300 FTSE c-suite business leaders and financial analysts, 1,000 members of the general public in UK and US and global social listening to assess trends, media sentiment and key influencers on COVID and business analysing 7.1m social media and online items.

The Echo study found that few trust the Government to get the response to COVID-19 right, with Americans at 33% slightly more supportive of the Trump administration’s COVID management than Briton’s 27% belief in Boris Johnson’s government’s handling of the pandemic Gen-Z (those aged 18-24) in the UK are by far the least trusting of the Government at 17% compared to 38% among their US cohorts, perhaps reflecting anger of the UK’s A-level results mismanagement and greatest concern for their future.

In all, 49% of UK adults say they are confused about the rules of COVID compliance, compared to 31% across the US.

Contrary to what might be expected, the researchers also found that focus on climate change has not slipped, as the majority of adults agree that they are changing their behaviour to lessen their impact on the environment – 62% of adults in the US and 52% of adults in the UK. And nearly half (47%) of all UK business leaders surveyed say they are addressing climate change actions.

Although companies have put culture as the number one learning from the pandemic, most people disagree that employers are thinking of people more – just under half (48%) in the US agree that that employers are thinking of people more, while only 36% in the UK feel that way.

Echo Research’s report showed that while the flexibility of remote working has been welcomed, the fairness of furlough continues to be questioned in online discussions and media. It concluded that nearly two thirds of adults polled do not believe that society will change for the better as a result of COVID-19.

The study, “About Trust and Expectations in the Time of COVID-19” is freely available to download from Echo Research’s website, please click here.

Background – Echo Research is an international market research company providing brand and reputation insights to drive performance improvement and transformation. It runs Britain’s Most Admired Companies study, the longest survey of corporate reputation in the country, and has served over 500 clients spanning all sectors since its inception in 1990.

Regine Raule
Echo Research
regine.raule@echoresearch.com
Visit us on social media:
Twitter
LinkedIn


Source: EIN Presswire

Maryland Voters Approve Sports Betting

maryland sports betting

maryland sports betting

Voters in the state of Maryland approved a ballot measure on Nov. 3, officially legalizing sports betting, it passed by a margin of close to 70-30.

We think this is a great opportunity for Maryland to bring revenue home from other nearby states that have authorized sports wagering.”

— FanDuel

BALTIMORE, MARYLAND, UNITED STATES, November 26, 2020 /EINPresswire.com/ — Voters in the state of Maryland approved a ballot measure on Nov. 3, officially legalizing the state's sports betting industry. Ballot question 2 was the measure that was in front of voters, and it passed by a margin of close to 70-30.

Commercial gambling is already legal in Maryland, but passing ballot question 2 added sports and event wagering to the mix. Most experts predicted that this would be a close vote, but the final results did not reflect that.

Lawmakers in the state of Maryland were looking to pass a bill to allow for legal betting on sports in 2020, but the COVID-19 pandemic made that a challenging task. The two political parties were unable to come to an official agreement but wanted to leave the decision up to voters.

This has been a process taken up by several states, and Maryland was not the only state to legalize sports betting on Election Day. Now the question is, when will Maryland sports betting be available, and what will the industry look like?

The Mid-Atlantic portion of the United States has seen tremendous growth in the industry since 2018, and Maryland was the last state in this region without a legalized sportsbook. Even though ballot question 2 was passed, Maryland will head into 2021 without sports betting, but that could soon change.
Operators Help the Campaign
Lawmakers in Maryland were hopeful that voters would help amend the Maryland sports betting laws, but they also got some support from two of the industry's biggest names. DraftKings and FanDuel are both set to benefit from sports betting coming to Maryland, and these operators spent a ton of money trying to persuade voters.

These two competitors joined together to form a campaign called "Vote Yes on Question 2." DraftKings and FanDuel allocated $2.75 million to help fund this campaign. However, just over $2 million of that budget was spent.

This aggressive marketing campaign focused on television, radio, and direct mail campaigns to convince voters to "vote yes." It's unclear just how much impact this campaign had, but the operators were able to get the result that they wanted.

“We think this is a great opportunity for Maryland to bring revenue home from other nearby states that have authorized sports wagering,” FanDuel said in a statement to the Baltimore Sun. “We’re hopeful we can bring FanDuel Sportsbook to Maryland in 2021.”

When the Maryland sports betting industry officially opens for business, both DraftKings and FanDuel will likely be two of the Maryland sportsbooks that offer betting. Other competitors will look to join the market as well, but these two operators have already made a big splash with sports bettors in the state.

Hurdles Still Remain

Now that voters in the state have approved ballot question 2, it is up to lawmakers to create rules and regulations to guide the industry. This was tried in 2020, but there was not enough time to get things approved.

One of the biggest questions has already been answered, it seems, and Maryland will look to offer online betting. States that provide online betting have been much more successful than those that have launched without this offering.

The Maryland sports betting laws will need to outline how many sports betting licenses are available and what companies can apply for these licenses. It is safe to assume that all six commercial casinos will be granted a license, but professional sports stadiums could be given that chance as well.

This process will likely take several months before a final bill is passed through the legislature, but Maryland sports betting is expected to be live at some point in 2021. Expect the betting industry to launch before the start of the 2021 college football season, as football is the most popular betting option throughout the US.

Joseph Falchetti
SafestBettingSites.com
email us here
Visit us on social media:
Twitter


Source: EIN Presswire

Premium Cosmetics Market 2020 Industry Size, Share, Price, Trend and Forecast to 2025

Wiseguyreports.Com Adds “Premium Cosmetics -Market Demand, Growth, Opportunities and Analysis Of Top Key Player Forecast To 2024” To Its Research Database

PUNE, MAHARASHTRA, INDIA, November 26, 2020 /EINPresswire.com/ — Premium Cosmetics Industry

Description

Wiseguyreports.Com Adds “Premium Cosmetics -Market Demand, Growth, Opportunities and Analysis Of Top Key Player Forecast To 2024” To Its Research Database

This report studies the global market size of Premium Cosmetics in key regions like North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Central & South America and Middle East & Africa, focuses on the consumption of Premium Cosmetics in these regions. 

This research report categorizes the global Premium Cosmetics market by players/brands, region, type and application. This report also studies the global market status, competition landscape, market share, growth rate, future trends, market drivers, opportunities and challenges, sales channels, distributors and Porter's Five Forces Analysis.

Premium cosmetics include skincare products, fragrances, color cosmetics, hair care products, sun care products, deodorants, baby care products, and bath products. 
The Americas will contribute significantly to the growth of the market due to the wide availability and adoption of premium products. 

In 2017, the global Premium Cosmetics market size was xx million US$ and is forecast to xx million US in 2025, growing at a CAGR of xx% from 2018. The objectives of this study are to define, segment, and project the size of the Premium Cosmetics market based on company, product type, application and key regions.

The various contributors involved in the value chain of Premium Cosmetics include manufacturers, suppliers, distributors, intermediaries, and customers. The key manufacturers in the Premium Cosmetics include 

Coty 
Estee Lauder 
L'Oreal 
LVMH 
Shiseido

Request for Sample Report @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/sample-request/3356040-global-premium-cosmetics-market-insights-forecast-to-2025

Market Size Split by Type 
Colour Makeup Is Tasted 
Hair Care Products 
Sunscreen 
Deodorant 
Baby Products 
Bath Products 

Market Size Split by Application 
Men 
Women

Market size split by Region 
North America 
United States 
Canada 
Mexico 
Asia-Pacific 
China 
India 

The study objectives of this report are: 
To study and analyze the global Premium Cosmetics market size (value & volume) by company, key regions/countries, products and application, history data from 2013 to 2017, and forecast to 2025. 
To understand the structure of Premium Cosmetics market by identifying its various subsegments. 
To share detailed information about the key factors influencing the growth of the market (growth potential, opportunities, drivers, industry-specific challenges and risks). 
Focuses on the key global Premium Cosmetics manufacturers, to define, describe and analyze the sales volume, value, market share, market competition landscape, SWOT analysis and development plans in next few years. 
To analyze the Premium Cosmetics with respect to individual growth trends, future prospects, and their contribution to the total market. 
To project the value and volume of Premium Cosmetics submarkets, with respect to key regions (along with their respective key countries). 
To analyze competitive developments such as expansions, agreements, new product launches, and acquisitions in the market. 
To strategically profile the key players and comprehensively analyze their growth strategies.

Leave a Query @  https://www.wiseguyreports.com/enquiry/3356040-global-premium-cosmetics-market-insights-forecast-to-2025

Table of Contents

1 Study Coverage 
1.1 Premium Cosmetics Product 
1.2 Key Market Segments 
1.3 Key Manufacturers Covered 
1.4 Market by Type 
1.4.1 Global Premium Cosmetics Market Size Growth Rate by Type 
1.4.2 Colour Makeup Is Tasted 
1.4.3 Hair Care Products 
1.4.4 Sunscreen 
1.4.5 Deodorant 
1.4.6 Baby Products 
1.4.7 Bath Products 
1.5 Market by Application 
1.5.1 Global Premium Cosmetics Market Size Growth Rate by Application 
1.5.2 Men 
1.5.3 Women 
1.6 Study Objectives 
1.7 Years Considered

2 Executive Summary 
2.1 Global Premium Cosmetics Market Size 
2.1.1 Global Premium Cosmetics Revenue 2016-2025 
2.1.2 Global Premium Cosmetics Sales 2016-2025 
2.2 Premium Cosmetics Growth Rate by Regions 
2.2.1 Global Premium Cosmetics Sales by Regions 
2.2.2 Global Premium Cosmetics Revenue by Regions

11 Company Profiles 
11.1 Coty 
11.1.1 Coty Company Details 
11.1.2 Company Description 
11.1.3 Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin of Premium Cosmetics 
11.1.4 Premium Cosmetics Product Description 
11.1.5 Recent Development 
11.2 Estee Lauder 
11.2.1 Estee Lauder Company Details 
11.2.2 Company Description 
11.2.3 Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin of Premium Cosmetics 
11.2.4 Premium Cosmetics Product Description 
11.2.5 Recent Development 
11.3 L'Oreal 
11.3.1 L'Oreal Company Details 
11.3.2 Company Description 
11.3.3 Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin of Premium Cosmetics 
11.3.4 Premium Cosmetics Product Description 
11.3.5 Recent Development 
11.4 LVMH 
11.4.1 LVMH Company Details 
11.4.2 Company Description 
11.4.3 Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin of Premium Cosmetics 
11.4.4 Premium Cosmetics Product Description 
11.4.5 Recent Development 
11.5 Shiseido 
11.5.1 Shiseido Company Details 
11.5.2 Company Description 
11.5.3 Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin of Premium Cosmetics 
11.5.4 Premium Cosmetics Product Description 
11.5.5 Recent Development

Buy Now @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/checkout?currency=one_user-USD&report_id=3356040

Continued…   

Contact Us: Sales@Wiseguyreports.Com Ph: +1-646-845-9349 (Us)  Ph: +44 208 133 9349 (Uk)

NORAH TRENT
WiseGuy Research Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
08411985042
email us here


Source: EIN Presswire

Ron Howard’s Hillbilly Elegy Releases on Netflix

The multi-generational tale of a family in the Appalachian Mountains stars Glenn Close, Amy Adams and Freida Pinto

LOS ANGELES, CA, UNITED STATES, November 25, 2020 /EINPresswire.com/ —
Netflix's Hillbilly Elegy has released on Netflix. Based on J.D. Vanes' #1 New York Times Bestseller, the film follows J.D. Vance (Gabriel Basso), a former Marine from southern Ohio and current Yale Law student, is on the verge of landing his dream job when a family crisis forces him to return to the home he’s tried to forget. J.D. must navigate the complex dynamics of his Appalachian family, including his volatile relationship with his mother Bev (Amy Adams), who’s struggling with addiction. Fueled by memories of his grandmother Mamaw (Glenn Close), the resilient and whip-smart woman who raised him, J.D. comes to embrace his family’s indelible imprint on his own personal journey.

Hillbilly Elegy is directed by Academy Award winner Ron Howard, and is a powerful personal memoir that offers a window into one family’s personal journey of survival and triumph. By following three colorful generations through their unique struggles, J.D.’s family story explores the highs and lows that define his family’s experience.

#HillbillyElegy
@NetflixFilm

Corby Pons
WIT PR
+1 3238072199
email us here
Visit us on social media:
Facebook
Twitter


Source: EIN Presswire

Amistad Project Files Litigation Calling More Than 200,000 Georgia Ballots into Question

Filing details pattern of unlawful actions that should render initial results invalid

AMHERST, VIRGINIA, UNITED STATES, November 25, 2020 /EINPresswire.com/ — The Amistad Project of the Thomas More Society today filed a lawsuit contesting the results of the 2020 presidential election in Georgia, citing expert opinion that well over 100,000 illegal votes were improperly counted, while tens of thousands of legal votes were not counted.

The expert analysis of government data showing that the total number of illegal votes counted and legal votes not counted is greater than 200,000 — vastly exceeding the 12,670-vote margin in the presidential election contest.

“The number of potentially fraudulent ballots we’ve identified in Georgia is over 15 times greater than the margin separating Donald Trump and Joe Biden. This finding undercuts the integrity of the general election,” said Phill Kline, Director of The Amistad Project. “The discrepancies we identified arose in large part because certain election officials acted with greater fealty to the dictates of private funders than to the laws set forth by the people’s representatives in the General Assembly.”

Systematic failures by state and local election officials to adhere to the procedures outlined in Georgia’s election code were encouraged and facilitated by private monies donated by Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg through a leftist organization called the Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL), which gave $6.3 million to Fulton County, and smaller amounts to at least a dozen other generally Democratic counties.

Under Georgia law, only the Secretary of State can take in monies for the purposes of conducting and administering elections from sources other than taxation. Even then, the only allowable exception applies to federal grants requested by the Secretary of State under the Help America Vote Act (HAVA).

The CTCL grants imposed a number of strict conditions on recipients, such as specifying the number of polling places and ballot drop boxes, as well as paying for additional staff to help voters comply with absentee ballot requests and certification requirements. Counties that were unaware of the CTCL grants or unable to receive such funds could not provide voters with the same advantages.

Failure to comply with all of the conditions set forth by CTCL would have required the counties to refund the entirety of the grant monies they received, which were used for essential expenses such as paying the salaries of election workers and funding the purchase of voting equipment.

Trey Trainor, the Chief Electoral Officer of the Federal Election Commission, reacted to a similar pattern of lawlessness and irregularities detailed in the Amistad Project’s litigation filed in Pennsylvania by asserting that “the referendum has not been open” and “this election is invalid.”

The Amistad Project is asking the courts to recognize that the same conclusions apply to Georgia, arguing that the violations outlined in the litigation deprived voters of due process and equal protection, and rendered the results of the election null and void. As a result, the only practical, legal remedy is to invalidate the election result and allow the Georgia General Assembly to appoint the state’s presidential Electors.

Reference: Case Number 6569790

##############

Jillian Anderson
ProActive
+1 330-980-3053
email us here


Source: EIN Presswire

On COVID-19, Anger Overtakes Fear; GenZ Least Trusting of UK Government

Gen-Z (those aged 18-24) in the UK are by far least trusting of the Government at 17%

Emotions around COVID in business context

Levels of trust in Government remain at an all-time low

LONDON, UNITED KINGDOM, November 25, 2020 /EINPresswire.com/ — Few people trust Government to get COVID-19 right, with Americans at 33% slightly more supportive of the Trump administration’s COVID management than Briton’s 27% belief in Boris Johnson’s government’s handling of the crisis.

According to Echo Research’s poll released today, Gen-Z (those aged 18-24) in the UK are by far the least trusting of the Government at 17%, compared to 38% among their US cohorts, perhaps reflecting anger of the UK’s A-level results mismanagement.

Echo’s study also found that 49% of UK adults say they are confused about the rules of COVID compliance, compared to 31% across the US.

During the early stages of the pandemic, online conversations about COVID-19 in relation to business express everything from joy to fear as the pandemic impacted people differently. With fear initially on the rise, greater anger and frustration are now taking over as lockdown and further restrictions are announced.

Overall, levels of trust in Government remain at an all-time low, and while trust in businesses (large and small) has also declined compared to Echo’s study in 2019.

Echo conducted an integrated study of stakeholder interviews, consumer polls and social listening to better frame and understand changes to Trust and Expectations at a time of COVID-19.

The full report by Echo Research, About Trust and Expectations at a Time of COVID, will be released later this week.

About Echo Research – Echo Research is an international market research company providing brand and reputation insights to drive performance improvement and transformation. It runs Britain’s Most Admired Companies study, the longest survey of corporate reputation in the country, and has served over 500 clients spanning all sectors since its inception in 1990.

Further information, please contact: Regine Raule, Marketing & Research Executive.

Regine Raule
Echo Research
regine.raule@echoresearch.com
Visit us on social media:
Twitter
LinkedIn


Source: EIN Presswire

Horse Protection Groups Back Bipartisan Congressional Letter Supporting Humane Treatment of Wild Horses

Wild horses held capitve in BLM holding facilities

Wild horses held capitve in BLM holding facilities

House leadership encouraged to preserve bipartisan amendment in final FY21 spending deal

Rounding up our iconic American wild horses and burros isn’t the answer. PZP provides a low-cost, long-term solution to protecting the horses whose very backs this country was built upon.”

— Marty Irby

WASHINGTON, DC, UNITED STATES, November 25, 2020 /EINPresswire.com/ — U.S. Rep. Steve Cohen, D-Tenn., joined by 21 Members of the U.S. House of Representatives, today sent a letter to House Leadership requesting it retain his Interior and Environment appropriations amendment requiring the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) to utilize $11 million in funding for humane, reversible fertility control for tens of thousands of wild horses and burros under the BLM’s protection. The measure, conceived by Cohen and Animal Wellness Action, passed the U.S. House in July by a voice vote, but was not included in the Senate’s version of the bill. Animal Wellness Action, the Animal Wellness Foundation, Horses for Life Foundation, Center for a Humane Economy, and other equine protection groups worked with Cohen in securing signors of the letter to House leaders and appropriators.

“We applaud Rep. Steve Cohen and the House Members who’ve joined our effort to implement the use of PZP birth control in wild horse and burro populations on public lands,” said Marty Irby, executive director at Animal Wellness Action, and a lifelong horseman who was recently honored by Her Majesty, Queen Elizabeth, II for his work to protect horses. “Rounding up and incarcerating our iconic American wild horses and burros – a failed strategy the BLM has long adhered to – isn’t the answer. PZP provides a low-cost, long-term sustainable solution to protecting the horses whose very backs this country was built upon, and we call on appropriators to include this measure in the year-end spending deal.”

“It’s long past time to end the old paradigm of managing America’s mustangs through archaic helicopter roundups and stockpiling these iconic wild animals in holding facilities,” said Allondra Stevens, founder of Horses For Life Foundation. “Humane management through the robust use of the fertility control, porcine zona pellucida (PZP), not only has the backing of science, but also the American public. Thanks to the leadership of U.S. Representative Steve Cohen (D-TN), Congress now has the opportunity to mandate that the Bureau of Land Management change course by ensuring PZP is implemented as a primary management method.”

“The American public wants our cherished and iconic wild horses and burros managed humanely on the public rangelands using proven PZP fertility control, not the failed policy of mass roundups and incarcerations,” said Scott Beckstead, director of campaigns at the Center for a Humane Economy and Animal Wellness Action.” We hope the House leadership will insist on dedicating $11 million to manage our herds in a way that allows them to live wild and free.”

“We write to urge your continued support for the humane and sustainable management of wild horses and burros on our public lands,” wrote the 21 Members of the House in the letter sent today. “To that end, we request dedicated funding in any final spending package for the implementation of humane, proven and reversible fertility control, namely the porcine zona pellucida (PZP) immunocontraceptive vaccine by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). We are pleased this amendment to support this effort was adopted by voice vote in the House of Representatives as part of its Fiscal Year (FY) 2021 Interior and Environment Appropriations bill.”

Read the entire letter here.

In addition to Rep. Cohen, the 21 Members that co-signed today’s letter include Reps. Vern Buchanan, R-Fla., Salud Carbajal, D-Calif., Gerald E. Connolly, D-Va., Peter DeFazio, D-Ore., Ted Deutch, D-Fla., Brian Fitzpatrick, R-Penn. Raúl M. Grijalva, D-Ariz., Deb Haaland, D-N.M., Alcee L. Hastings, D-Fla., John Katko, R-N.Y., Ro Khanna, D-Calif. Raja Krishnamoorthi, D-Ill., Barbara Lee, D-Calif.,Ted W. Lieu, D-Calif., Carolyn B. Maloney, D-N.Y. Joe Neguse, D-Colo., Lucille Roybal-Allard, D-Calif., Jan Schakowsky, D-Ill., David Schweikert, R-Ariz., Adam Smith, D-Wash., and Dina Titus, D-Nev.

Animal Wellness Action is a Washington, D.C.-based 501(c)(4) organization with a mission of helping animals by promoting legal standards forbidding cruelty. We champion causes that alleviate the suffering of companion animals, farm animals, and wildlife. We advocate for policies to stop dogfighting and cockfighting and other forms of malicious cruelty and to confront factory farming and other systemic forms of animal exploitation. To prevent cruelty, we promote enacting good public policies, and we work to enforce those policies. To enact good laws, we must elect good lawmakers, and that’s why we remind voters which candidates care about our issues and which ones don’t. We believe helping animals helps us all.

The Animal Wellness Foundation is a Los Angeles-based private charitable organization with a mission of helping animals by making veterinary care available to everyone with a pet, regardless of economic ability. We organize rescue efforts and medical services for dogs and cats in need and help homeless pets find a loving caregiver. We are advocates for getting veterinarians to the front lines of the animal welfare movement; promoting responsible pet ownership; and vaccinating animals against infectious diseases such as distemper. We also support policies that prevent animal cruelty and that alleviate suffering. We believe helping animals helps us all.

The Center for a Humane Economy (“the Center”) is a non-profit organization that focuses on influencing the conduct of corporations to forge a humane economic order. The first organization of its kind in the animal protection movement, the Center encourages businesses to honor their social responsibilities in a culture where consumers, investors, and other key stakeholders abhor cruelty and the degradation of the environment and embrace innovation as a means of eliminating both.

Horses For Life Foundation is an advocacy and education group dedicated to ending the slaughter of American horses, protecting wild horses and burros on public lands, and ending equine abuse and neglect through advocacy, public education, and legislative reform.

Marty Irby
Animal Wellness Action
+17024199410 ext.
email us here
Visit us on social media:
Facebook
Twitter


Source: EIN Presswire

Amistad Project Files Litigation Calling More Than 150,000 Wisconsin Ballots into Question

Extensive investigations and data analysis reveal pattern of illegality and fraud that cast doubt on validity of unofficial election results

AMHERST, VIRGINIA, UNITED STATES, November 25, 2020 /EINPresswire.com/ — A national conservative organization, The Amistad Project, today filed an emergency petition with the Wisconsin Supreme Court challenging the state’s unofficial results in the 2020 presidential election, which gave Democrat candidate Joe Biden a margin of just 20,000 votes over Republican candidate Donald Trump.

“We have identified over 150,000 potentially fraudulent ballots in Wisconsin, more than enough to call into question the validity of the state’s reported election results,” said Phill Kline, Director of The Amistad Project of the Thomas More Society. “Moreover, these discrepancies were a direct result of Wisconsin election officials’ willful violation of state law.”

The discrepancies discovered in the Amistad Project’s investigation, conducted in the last several weeks, include more than ten thousand Republican ballots that weren’t counted, more than ten thousand Republican voters who had their ballots requested and filled in by another person, and around a hundred thousand illegal ballots that were counted anyway [Appendix A]. The problematic ballots were identified in a data analysis performed by statistician Matthew Braynard and mathematician Steven Miller.

The lawsuit details a series of illegal actions taken by Wisconsin officials that led to significant numbers of improper votes being counted, as well as tens of thousands of legal votes that were not counted.

One of the most impactful violations involved election officials brazenly defying state laws designed to ensure the integrity of absentee ballots, specifically provisions requiring voters to present photo identification when requesting an absentee ballot. The only exceptions to this requirement outlined in law apply to voters who are either “hospitalized” or “indefinitely confined because of age, physical illness, or infirmity.”

Local election officials unilaterally interpreted the “indefinitely confined” exemption to apply to persons suffering from COVID-19, and the Wisconsin Election Commission exceeded its statutory authority by issuing “guidance” instructing election clerks not to reject voters who cite the exemption, even if the officials have knowledge that the individuals in question are no longer indefinitely confined.

Statistical analysis indicates that nearly 100,000 persons who exploited this exemption to cast absentee ballots were not actually indefinitely confined on Election Day, meaning they should not have been eligible to vote.

Election officials in various counties and municipalities also failed to enforce residency requirements, filled in missing information on absentee ballots, and willfully violated other explicit provisions of Wisconsin’s election code.

The cities and counties where these violations occurred were among the six jurisdictions with reliably left-leaning populations that together received in excess of $6 million from the Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL), a left-leaning organization funded by $350 million donated by Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg. Receipt of this funding was itself a violation of state law. Jurisdictions that did not receive CTCL monies, on the other hand, generally followed state laws.

In response to a similar pattern of lawlessness and irregularities detailed in litigation filed in Pennsylvania, the Chief Electoral Officer of the Federal Election Commission, Trey Trainor, recently remarked that “the referendum has not been open” and “this election is invalid.”

Based on the sheer scale and scope of the illegality in Wisconsin, the statistical evidence makes clear that the unofficial election results reported by the state are illegitimate and inconclusive, leaving the state legislature as the only body that can lawfully appoint Wisconsin’s 10 presidential Electors.

Reference: 2020AP1930-OA

Jillian Anderson
ProActive
+1 330-980-3053
email us here


Source: EIN Presswire

Lyfeloop Condemns Facebook for naming Joe Biden President-Elect

Best Facebook Alternative in 2020 is Lyfeloop

Best Facebook Alternative in 2020 is Lyfeloop

Lyfeloop Free Speech Facebook Alternative

Lyfeloop Free Speech Facebook Alternative

Best Facebook Alternative Lyfeloop

Lyfeloop Calls Out Facebook With Election Outcome Unclear Amid Pending Recounts and Legal Challenges

The labeling of Joe Biden as ‘president-elect’ is fake, and everyone knows it. ”

— Justin Malonson-Lyfeloop Founder

WASHINGTON, DC, UNITED STATES, November 25, 2020 /EINPresswire.com/ — Facebook Alternative and Free speech social platform Lyfeloop Condemned Facebook for falsely calling Joe Biden the 2020 election presidential nominee. Stating that seeing obvious election fraud and still declaring a winner of the election before all results are certified and any legal challenges are resolved is election meddling. " It's so obvious what they have been doing all year with censorship.  Our nation is moving into uncharted territory as multiple legal challenges have been filed in response to the 2020 elections, with more challenges expected to come. Both candidates have claimed victory in certain states, but it appears increasingly likely that this election will be resolved in the courts. For that reason, no one without a bias or agenda would declare a winner of the 2020 presidential election until all results are certified and any legal challenges are resolved." States Lyfeloop Founder Justin Malonson. Lyfeloop has repeatedly condemned mainstream media new outlets and major social media platforms for their censorship in 2020. News sources, for example, Reuters, CNN, NBC, ABC and a plenty of others have all emphatically reported Joe Biden as the duly elected president, regardless of the exceptional claims and endeavors to describe casts a ballot the nation over that still can't seem to be finished.  Web-based media distributers have additionally mistakenly marked Joe Biden as the duly elected president, proceeding with the spread of deception concerning the result of the 2020 political race. Last week social media publisher Facebook revised their initial labeling of Joe Biden as “president-elect,” changing it to back to “politician.” The Federal Inquirer stated that it was in response to more than 2 million users leaving Facebook to join it's main competitor Lyfeloop.

Regarding censoring free speech and America’s election process, Justin Malonson, 16+ year investigative researcher and Founder of Lyfeloop—a free speech social media platform that recently won the award for Best Facebook Alternative in 2020—remarked the following:

“The labeling of Joe Biden as ‘president-elect’ is fake, and everyone knows it. With all the fake fact checking and censorship they have done this year, they lost what little if any credibility they had left. Facebook was created by Darpa anyway. They have lost the trust of millions of their users for numerous reasons including: selling user data to 3rd parties, banning accredited users while allowing spammers to run free, discrimination (political, medical, religious) and having a total disrespect for user safety. All Facebook does is censor real content and allow fake content to be uncensored. They have also disrespected U.S. Federal Government and European Union' guidelines that are in place to protect us. This massive breech of trust has created a feeling of unrest amid users which have since looked to Facebook alternatives like Lyfeloop that are fun, safe and trustworthy places to interact with family and friends. ”

Given today's ever growing social media censorship, individuals are aching for genuine platform to share, connect and befriend like minded people without being censored for no reason. Lyfeloop is venturing directly into that void and having a genuine effect. Lyfeloop does not mine or sell data, and does not remove content based on politics or ideology. Lyfeloop is putting the "social" back into "social media" with more and more people joining the platform every day.

About Lyfeloop
LyfeLoop a better place for you to interact with family and friends. LyfeLoop is gives users everything they loved about other platforms minus all the censorship, fake fact checking, bias and security issues. Lyfeloop is a fun, safe and trustworthy places to interact with family and friends. The platform creates an experience that allows for discovery of exciting stories, the creation of meaningful connections and the consistent sharing of content that matters. With a mission of connecting your world on your terms. With its capabilities for delivering 100% of all posts to page followers, Lyfeloop is available via desktop or app from the Apple or Google Play store, for more information please visit www.lyfeloop.com

Britney Morgan
Public Affairs Administration
email us here


Source: EIN Presswire