US Credit Czar David Howe Reports Priceline and Hotel Pennsylvania to Federal Government

Priceline hotel receipt at time of booking -- 'Facilities' fee undisclosed

Priceline hotel receipt at time of booking — ‘Facilities’ fee undisclosed

Undisclosed 'Facilities' fee added at departure - Federal UDAAP

Undisclosed ‘Facilities’ fee added at departure – Federal UDAAP

Federal UDAAP violation conspicuous at New York City landmark hotel following Priceline booking

I sincerely hope one day consumers will wise up to the harms of deregulation. I sincerely hope one day consumers will respond to these predatory practices with a unified voice at the ballot box.”

— US Credit Czar David Howe

NEW YORK, NEW YORK, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, August 8, 2018 /EINPresswire.com/ — SubscriberWise, the nation’s largest issuing CRA for the communications industry and the leading protector of children victimized by identity fraud, announced today the formal complaint (FTC #98676841) for an undisclosed daily ‘Facilities Fee’ of $34.42 (taxes included) charged at check-out by the Hotel Pennsylvania, 401 Seventh Ave at 33rd Street, New York, NY.

The undisclosed and predatory fee is considered by the United States Federal Trade Commission as an ‘UDAAP’ because it is patently ‘unfair and deceptive’ in nature when not conspicuously disclosed at the point of sale.

See UDAAP: https://www.cfpaguide.com/portalresource/Exam%20Manual%20v%202%20-%20UDAAP.pdf

“It’s remarkable that we live in a society that tolerates what I call ‘sanctioned theft’,” remarked David Howe, USA Credit Czar, America’s child identity guardian, and founder of SubscriberWise. “The idea that the Hotel Pennsylvania, and hotels anywhere in the USA for that matter, can so brazenly misrepresent the price of a room is an outrage in a world where computer technology could easily itemize these otherwise hidden and predatory fees.

“But concealing the full price is exactly – and literally – what the hotel industry is banking on,” conceded Howe.

“In other words, there’s simply no reason that US and state regulators turn a blind eye to these unfair and deceptive practices. The notion that a 3rd party offering a hotel property to its members is somehow unable to disclose a complete and accurate accounting of daily mandatory hotels fees is wholly ridiculous.

“As for Priceline’s role in these predatory money schemes, it appears that the organization is not directly responsible when the hotel fails to display the true cost of a room. However, it’s my strong position that Priceline — and other 3rd-party aggregators — should immediately and permanently remove any hotel from its list of published properties if the fees are not fully and conspicuously itemized.

Related Washington Post Story: https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/travel/hotel-resort-fees-hidden-charges-bemoaned-by-travelers-are-climbing-higher-than-ever/2017/07/20/a56256d0-68b1-11e7-a1d7-9a32c91c6f40_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.f6b1b1752fae

“For the record, I spoke with ‘Dave’ in the accounting department at the Hotel Pennsylvania today. I also spoke to ‘Iris’ at Priceline. Each told me the same thing. They both said I’d need to dispute with the other party. And I did exactly that and accomplished nothing but excuses for this obvious predatory practice of deceiving consumers.

“The only advice that was consistent from each: READ THE FINE PRINT,” Howe quipped.

“In fact, Dave told me it was my responsibility to read the fine print,” continued Howe. “Iris justified the fee by reading Priceline's fine print, which was apparently contained on the final booking page – where, of course, the actual fee and total amount was not: ‘Hotel charges may be mandatory (e.g., resort fees) or optional (parking, phone calls or minibar charges) and are not included in the room rate’. My question to both: ‘What if the fee happened to be $500.00 or $5000.00 per day! Shouldn’t a customer know this information…?’

“Apparently, since neither could answer my question, it’s okay if the heist is something more modest, for example $50.00 or less,” Howe added. “My guess is once the hidden fee reaches the $100.00 mark, then consumers – and no doubt complicit lawmakers – will finally demand an end to this shameful business scam.

“Yes, it’s just another way that consumers are fleeced by dishonest and predatory businesses engaged in ‘DRIP’ pricing and federal ‘UDAAP’ violations,” the Credit Czar concluded. “I sincerely hope one day consumers will wise up to the harms of deregulation. I sincerely hope one day consumers will respond to these predatory practices with a unified voice at the ballot box.”

About SubscriberWise

By incorporating years of communications performance data and decision models, including FICO's latest analytic technology (FICO 9 Score), SubscriberWise® delivers unprecedented predictive power with a fully compliant, score driven decision management system. SubscriberWise is a risk management preferred-solutions provider for the National Cable Television Cooperative (www.nctconline.org). The NCTC helps nearly 1000 members nationwide.

SubscriberWise is a U.S.A. federally registered trademark of the SubscriberWise Limited Liability Co.

Media Relations
SubscriberWise
330-880-4848 x137
email us here


Source: EIN Presswire

Cuomo’s agencies out of control

Gov. Andrew Cuomo must be stopped, he is involved in covering-up thousands of sexual assaults, rapes and deaths of people with disabilities

Cuomo’s Justice Center and Department of Health are corrupt and lawless

Governor Andrew Cuomo has proven over the years to not be concerned about the equal rights or safety of our most vulnerable.”

— Michael Carey – Civil Rights & Disability Rights Advocate

ALBANY, NEW YORK, UNITED STATES, August 8, 2018 /EINPresswire.com/ — The Jonathan Carey Foundation for many years has researched and uncovered levels of criminal corruption and fraud that quite frankly is astronomical in scope. Lawlessness is the best way to explain the internal policing and the withholding of crimes from local law enforcement and county district attorney’s.

As Governor Andrew Cuomo’s agencies literally cover-up almost all sexual assaults, rapes and negligent deaths of people with disabilities they go after child operating a lemonade stand and whistle-blowers exposing wide-scale fraud and corruption. Where is the justice when thousands of crimes committed against the disabled are never treated as crimes and are covered-up internally? Where is the justice when Cuomo’s Department of Health ignores the safety of the disabled and known life threatening hazards such as radon gas poisoning?

It is much more than this though, vast amounts of State and federal Medicaid dollars are being misappropriated that are supposed to go to provide safe care and services free from abuse and neglect. Governor Andrew Cuomo has proven over the years to not be concerned about the equal rights or safety of our most vulnerable. It’s about hiding the severe damages and loss of lives is what the governor is concerned about. Cuomo’s Justice Center is nothing close to a Justice Center, but the exact opposite. Close to 8,000 calls are reported to his abuse hotline every month and between 11-13 deaths every day. Almost everything disappears internally as the local police are not notified of most crimes and criminal investigations rarely occur. This criminal scheme which is without question wide-scale obstruction of justice is protecting the worst in society, not vulnerable children and adults with disabilities.

Michael Carey
The Jonathan Carey Foundation
(518) 852-9377
email us here

The incredible life and tragic preventable death of Jonathan Carey, who was disabled, had autism, was non-verbal & only 13 when he was killed by his caregivers


Source: EIN Presswire

In Sri Lanka, Bosnian-style Ethnic Separation is Way Forward for Peace; Need Help from US, EU and India:Tamils for Trump

Mass Killing of Tamils in Sri Lanka

Mass Killing of Muslims in Bosnia

If Sri Lanka declines to acknowledge compromise for Bosnian-style ethnic separation, partition will be the defaulted answer for Tamils.

NEW YORK, NEW YORK, USA, August 8, 2018 /EINPresswire.com/ — In Sri Lanka, Bosnian-style Ethnic Separation is Way Forward for Peace; Need Help from US, EU and India: Tamils for Trump

A spokesman for Tamils for Trump suggested that “Any political solution for the problems of the Tamils will never be accepted by the Sinhalese. Our past history for over seven decades shows that it is impossible for the Sinhalese to accept any political solution for helping the Tamils. But let’s try a solution that the US tried and successfully implemented in Bosnia. It is the new norm in the world. If Sri Lanka fails to embrace a solution acceptable to the Tamils, we should separate from Sri Lanka.”

Ethnic cleansing led to the creation of homogenous areas (Sinhalese-dominated areas) in Tamil-inhabited regions of North-East Sri Lanka. The international community, especially the US, the EU and India, should undo this to ensure a safe and complete return of Tamil refugees, including internally- and externally-uprooted Tamils.

This ethnic cleansing began in Ceylon, now Sri Lanka, immediately after Ceylon’s independence from the British Empire, and is similar to what later happened in Bosnia by the Serbs.

The US thinking in Dayton, Ohio, Dayton Agreement in 1995, proposed a conflict resolution for Bosnia that made Bosnia an ethnically-separated country, where there would be no minorities and no majority among the ethnic group. It is the lesson learnt from pre-war Bosnia, as ethno-national homogeneous statelets emerged, in which one dominant group (Serbs) prevailed and all other groups were considered minorities. Serbians became the majority in all states, and the US anticipates that the Serbian genocide will proceed in Bosnia in the future, as well.

We Tamils should learn from the Bosnian resolution. The Eastern province had a Tamil population of 98%, but after ethnic cleansing the Tamil population was lowered to 45%. The US, the EU and India should ask Sri Lanka to reclaim her Sinhalese settlers and bring them back to their own particular towns or locales in the south, so that Tamils who were displaced to various parts of Sri Lanka, especially in southern Sri Lanka, but also to India, the US, Canada, Europe and numerous other nations, can settle back to their own property.

The Bosnian-style federal constitution and ethnic separation has kept the Muslims and Croats upbeat, and has forced the Serbians to acknowledge the truth that Serbians can no longer oppress the Bosnians or conduct inhumane killings. This federal constitution is a warning for any Serbian oppressor, that if ethnic cleansing proceeds, the next step will be break-up of possible three countries or separation. So far Bosnia is in peace, regardless of some Serbian noise about their loss of Majority status.

US policy makers have proposed that Bosnian-style ethnic separation is also suited for Iraq’s ethnic battling among Sunnis, Kurds and Shias. This is discussed in an article published by the Wilson Center in Washington, D.C. “Institutionalized Ethnic Division in Bosnia: A Way Forward for Iraq?” (2007).

The article states, “The Biden-Gelb plan has been widely discussed as a solution for the faltering policy in Iraq. A major component of the plan is to decentralize power in Iraq—Bosnian style—to the three main ethnic and religious groups in an effort to end the civil war” (2007).

Additionally, “The Dayton model for Bosnia employs certain minority rights conventions–the concept of autonomy in particular–to institutionally separate ethnic groups while simultaneously encouraging cooperation at higher levels of government” (Wilson Center, 2007).

A spokesman for Tamils for Trump recently argued that “The US, EU and India should follow the Bosnian style blueprint and apply it to Sri Lanka. It gives full federal constitution along with ethnic separation. We think this is the best way forward to bring peace and security and secure the Tamil Homeland for Tamils.

“Further we urge that it is time for Tamils who live in the south to come back to their homes in the North-East, bringing along their businesses, skill sets and assets, so that we can install a permanent peace and establish prosperity and safety for the Tamils in Ceylon with the help of the US, the EU and India.

Numerous diasporas of Tamils in the West as of now are returning to their Home Land and intending to settle when a lasting peace or US-ensured peace is clearly inescapable in the future.”

The Tamil spokesman finished up with "If Sri Lanka declines to acknowledge compromise for Bosnian-style ethnic separation, partition will be the defaulted answer for Tamils."

Communication Director
Tamils for Trump
914 721 0505
email us here


Source: EIN Presswire

U.S. Court of Appeals schedules oral hearing in case of controversial shooting of unarmed, 20-year-old Jayvis Benjamin

Patrick Michael Megaro, Criminal Defense Attorney

Patrick Michael Megaro, Criminal Defense Attorney

Video Appeals Attorney Patrick Megaro YouTube Video

Video Appeals Attorney Patrick Megaro YouTube Video

Video of Attorney Patrick Megaro, Florida

Video of Attorney Patrick Megaro, Florida

Patrick Megaro, Attorney, on Today Exclusive Television

Patrick Megaro, Attorney, on Today Exclusive Television

Website AppealsLawGroup, Patrick Michael Megaro, Criminal Defense Lawyer

Website AppealsLawGroup, Patrick Michael Megaro, Criminal Defense Lawyer

Attorney for the family of Benjamin, Patrick Megaro, will argue the issues before the appeals court.

Halscott Megaro PA (N/A:N/A)

This case has been controversial and divisive. Facts are in dispute. Hopefully the hearing before the Court will clarify the issues for a just resolution of the matter.”

— Patrick Megaro, Defense Lawyer

ORLANDO, FLORIDA, UNITED STATES, August 7, 2018 /EINPresswire.com/ — The law firm of Halscott Megaro PA announced that an appeal involving the shooting Jayvis Benjamin will be heard by the Court of Appeals. In January 2013, Lynn Thomas, a police officer in Decatur, Georgia shot and killed an unarmed 20-year-old black college student, Jayvis Benjamin. Benjamin had allegedly stolen a car and crashed it in a residential front yard. Officer Thomas shot and killed Benjamin after he exited the vehicle through the window because the door would not open. The facts as to what exactly happened when Benjamin exited are in dispute. The police cruiser’s dashboard video of the incident is inconclusive, the shooting took place off-camera.

A civil grand jury recommended officer Lynn Thomas be indicted for Benjamin’s death. In March 2016, however, the District Attorney decided not to charge the police officer, supposedly because its investigation concluded that a struggle had ensued. See news report https://decaturish.com/2016/03/reports-avondale-estates-officer-will-not-be-charged-for-shooting-unarmed-man/

Officer Thomas was subsequently promoted to Police Chief in 2016. See the news report at https://decaturish.com/2016/07/avondale-estates-officials-defend-hiring-police-chief-who-shot-unarmed-man/

With the assistance of attorney Patrick Megaro, Benjamin’s mother filed a lawsuit over the death of her son in May 2016 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (civil rights violations) in the U.S. District Court, Northern District of Georgia, alleging Excessive Force, Negligent Hiring/Training/Retention of Employment Services, and Wrongful Death against Avondale Estates Police Department (AEPD) Sergeant Lynn Thomas, Officer Thomas Gillis, Chief Gary L. Broden, and The City of Avondale Estates. All of the defendants except for Lynn Thomas were dismissed from the case. Lynn Thomas successfully moved for summary judgment (a decision based on the pleadings and available evidence before an actual trial), resulting in an appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.

The Court of Appeals determined on August 3 that oral argument is necessary in this case. The issues in the case are essentially as follows: whether there are material facts in dispute that preclude summary judgment, especially where the issue is excessive force, and whether deadly force was justified under the circumstances in which Jayvis Benjamin was not being arrested for a violent offense, was not armed, and did not attack Lynn Thomas.

Patrick Megaro, the attorney for Benjamin’s family, noted that he appreciates the opportunity to explain the disputed issues to the Court. “This case has been controversial and divisive. Facts are in dispute. Hopefully the hearing before the Court will clarify the issues for a just resolution of the matter.”

This incident has been widely reported and commented on in the press. Based on the published articles and opinions, it appears that to this day the facts are still controversial and disputed. The many news articles about the incident include, apart from the two articles referred to above:

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution: “DeKalb DA: Cop won’t be charged in controversial shooting,” https://www.myajc.com/news/crime–law/dekalb-cop-won-charged-controversial-shooting/Rf5YuWCDyIY321rHX2m8GN/

New York Daily News: “King: A Georgia cop gunned down unarmed black student Jayvis Benjamin nearly three years ago — so why no grand jury hearing?,” http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/king-georgia-won-indict-fatally-shot-black-man-article-1.2466691

The appeals case is MONTYE BENJAMIN, and on her own behalf as administratrix for the estate of her Son Jayvis Ledell Benjamin v. LYNN THOMAS, Court of Appeals Docket #: 18-10204 (United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit)

About Attorney Patrick Megaro

Patrick Michael Megaro is a partner at Halscott Megaro PA. His primary areas of practice are criminal defense, criminal appeals, post-conviction relief, civil appeals, and civil rights litigation.

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/halscottassociates/

Website: https://www.appealslawgroup.com/our-attorneys/patrick-megaro-esq/

Patrick Megaro
Halscott Megaro, P.A.
(407) 255-2164
email us here

What Happens at an Arraignment Hearing? Patrick Megaro, Criminal Defense Attorney


Source: EIN Presswire

Citizens Commission on Human Rights Holds 3rd Annual Banquet Honoring Purple Heart Day

U.S. Marine Corps Color Guard

U.S. Marine Corps Color Guard

3rd Annual Purple Heart Day Banquet

3rd Annual Purple Heart Day Banquet

3rd Annual Purple Heart Day Banquet

Mental Health Watchdog exposes psychiatric abuse of veterans at event held to honor those brave men and women who were injured during their service.

One in six American service members are on one or more psychiatric drugs and our government has spent over $4.5 billion on these drugs for soldiers and veterans.”

— Diane Stein, President of CCHR Florida

CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, UNITED STATES, August 7, 2018 /EINPresswire.com/ — Mental Health Watchdog exposes psychiatric abuse of veterans at event held to honor those brave men and women who were injured during their service and the families of those who gave the ultimate sacrifice.

In a ceremony attended by over 350 military and civilian guests, the Florida chapter of the Citizens Commission on Human Rights (CCHR) hosted its 3rd Annual Purple Heart Day Banquet in the historic Fort Harrison. This yearly event is held to honor those who have been wounded or killed in battle, and to expose the destructive psychiatric drugging of U.S. veterans.

Acting as Mistress of Ceremonies, the Executive Director of CCHR Florida opened the event by reviewing the 225-year history of the Purple Heart and introducing the Military Tribute. Horn players performed “Fanfare for the Common Man” as the U.S. Marine Corps Color Guard presented the colors with full ceremony. Next the Pledge of Allegiance and National Anthem were followed by a U.S. Marine Corps bugler playing “Taps”. Father Bob Swick of the Tampa Bay Veterans Alliance then led the attendees in prayer.

The keynote speaker was Purple Heart recipient Lance Corporal Mike DeLancy. Corporal DeLancy spoke vividly of being seriously wounded in combat in Iraq. He described the new life purpose he discovered in founding the nonprofit Wounded Warriors Abilities Ranch, operating a 10-acre ranch in Pinellas to help veterans get and stay active. “In my experience, getting out of the house and active in your community works better than any pill could,” he said.

Next, Mr. Adolfo Valero, a 30-year veteran of the U.S. Army Special Forces, spoke of how he entered law school after retirement, to help veterans fight for their rights, as an attorney. “You don’t get happy soldiers and veterans with a system that only offers psychotropic drugs or electric shock therapy as treatment for the pressures and stresses we endure”, he said. He cited statistics correlating the suicide rate of veterans and the use of psychiatric drugs on soldiers. “As an officer, I had the responsibility and challenge of ensuring that my men come home safe,” he said. “So when I hear about the number of veterans or soldiers committing suicide every day, these are statistics that I will not ignore.”

Mr. Valero closed by acknowledging CCHR as “the boots on the ground” who “go in and pull people out of harm’s way.”

The final quest speaker, Ms. Diane Stein, President of CCHR Florida, read a letter from one of the founders of CCHR, L. Ron Hubbard, written to the parents of a sailor under his command whose morale suffered due to lack of mail from home. ““Please write your boy often”, the letter closed. “He loves you or he would not worry about you so. Please send him the letters which are such a large factor in sustaining his morale in the face of the glorious task he must perform.”

Stein described how Mr. Hubbard worked with service personnel and veterans as early as 1940 to find effective, low cost and non-drug-based solutions to the problems he saw his men experiencing during service. “His goal was to remedy what we would call today Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder”, she said.

Giving a brief overview of the history of CCHR, Ms. Stein described the co-founding of this mental health watchdog by the Church of Scientology and renowned psychiatrist, Dr. Thomas Szasz, a Lifetime Fellow of the American Psychiatric Association who had become critical of barbaric measures taken by psychiatry starting after the war. He wrote over 35 books on the subject and joined CCHR as Founding Commissioner in 1969. Today, CCHR is the leading non-profit, non-religious, non-political mental health watchdog on this planet with more than 250 chapters across 34 countries

Ms. Stein noted that officially, one in six American service members are on one or more psychiatric drugs and that in ten years, the U.S. government has spent over $4.5 billion on these drugs for soldiers and veterans. The labeled side effects for these psychiatric drugs include mania, psychosis, violence, suicidal ideation, and increased aggression, as well as lasting damage on the body’s nervous system.

“CCHR has worked for almost 50 years for full informed consent in the field of mental health”, she said. “It is in this spirit that CCHR Florida pledges to continue working with everyone here tonight to do what we can to protect and improve lives while eradicating abuses in the mental health industry.”

CCHR Florida has scheduled a follow-up seminar entitled PTSD: The Hidden Enemy at their center at 109 N. Fort Harrison Ave, Clearwater. An experienced Army veteran will address questions of PTSD, what it is and how it should be treated.

To learn more please call 727-442-8820 or visit www.cchrflorida.org.

About CCHR: Initially established by the Church of Scientology and renowned psychiatrist Dr. Thomas Szasz in 1969, CCHR’s mission is to eradicate abuses committed under the guise of mental health and enact patient and consumer protections. L. Ron Hubbard, founder of Scientology, first brought psychiatric imprisonment to wide public notice: “Thousands and thousands are seized without process of law, every week, over the ‘free world’ tortured, castrated, killed. All in the name of ‘mental health,’” he wrote in March 1969.

Sources: https://www.cchrint.org/issues/the-hidden-enemy/

Diane Stein
Citizens Commission on Human Rights of Florida
(727) 422-8820
email us here

Drugging the American Soldier—Military’s reliance on strong psychiatric drugs


Source: EIN Presswire

தமிழர்கள் ஸ்ரீலங்காவின் புதிய அரசியலமைப்பை நிராகரிக்க வேண்டும், இல்லையென்றால் அமெரிக்கா நெம்புகோலை இழந்துவிடும்.

ஸ்ரீலங்காவின் புதிய அரசியலமைப்பின் மீதான வாக்கெடுப்பு

ஸ்ரீலங்காவின் புதிய அரசியலமைப்பின் மீதான வாக்கெடுப்பு

போஸ்னியன் பாணி கூட்டாட்சி அறிமுகப்படுத்தப்படவில்லை என்றால், தமிழர்கள் தமிழீழம்தொடர்பான கோரிக்கையை திரும்பப் பெறுவார்கள் என்பது யதார்த்தம்.

NEW YORK, NEW YORK, USA, August 6, 2018 /EINPresswire.com/ — தமிழர்கள் ஸ்ரீலங்காவின் புதிய அரசியலமைப்பை நிராகரிக்க வேண்டும், இல்லையென்றால்அமெரிக்கா, ஐரோப்பிய ஒன்றியம் மற்றும் இந்தியா ஆகியவை தங்கள் நெம்புகோலை இழந்துவிடும்.

புதிய அரசியலமைப்பில் என்ன இருக்கும் என்று எவருக்கும் தெரியாது.

ஆனால் டாக்டர் ஜெயம்பதியின் கூற்றின்படி, இலங்கையில் ஒற்றை ஆட்சி தான் புதிய அரசியல் அமைப்பில் இருப்பதும், மாகாண சபைகளுக்கு அரசியலமைப்பில் ஒரு அதிகாரமும் இல்லை என்பதும் வட கிழக்கு இணைப்பு இல்லை என்பதும் உறுதி செய்துள்ளார்.

எனவே, தமிழர்கள் ஒற்றை ஆட்சியை நிராகரிக்க வேண்டும். ஒற்றை ஆட்சியில் 2/3 அதிகாரங்கள் சிங்களவர்களுக்கு உரியது. எனவே அவர்கள் விரும்பும் அனைத்தையும் செய்யமுடியும். தமிழ் கிராமங்கள் மற்றும் அவர்களது நிலங்களைக் கைப்பற்றுவது, சிங்களகுடியேற்றங்கள், தமிழீழத்தில் இராணுவத்தை வைத்திருப்பது, சிங்கள பொலிஸ் மற்றும்இராணுவத்தினரால் அச்சுறுத்தல் மூலம் தமிழர்களை அடிமையாக வைத்து கொள்வது, மற்றும் எம்மால் ஏற்றுக்கொள்ள முடியாத செயல்கள் ஆகியவற்றை மேற்கொள்ளல்.

தமிழர்களுக்கு சம உரிமைகள் வழங்க கூடிய அரசியல் அமைப்பு கூட்டாட்சி (சம்ஷடி) அரசியலமைப்பு அல்லது தனி நாடு மட்டுமே.

போஸ்னியா பாணி கூட்டாட்சிவாதம், சிங்களம் மற்றும் தமிழர்களுக்கு சம அந்தஸ்தை கொடுக்கும் . போஸ்னிய பாணியில் கூட்டாட்சிவாதத்தை ஸ்ரீலங்கா நிராகரிக்கிறார்கள் என்றால். தமிழர்கள் தமிழீழத்திற்கான கோரிக்கைக்கு திரும்பிச் செல்ல வேண்டும். அதாவது ஸ்ரீலங்காவில் இருந்து வட, கிழக்கு பிரிவினையை உண்டுபண்ண முயற்சிகளை செய்யவேண்டும்.

குறிப்பு: போஸ்னிய பாணி கூட்டாட்சி என்பது அமெரிக்க மற்றும் பிற சக்திவாய்ந்த நாடுகளின் இனத்துவ யுத்தத்தைத் தவிர்க்க சமீபத்திய அரசியலமைப்பு அங்கீகாரம் ஆகும்.

அமெரிக்கா, ஐரோப்பிய ஒன்றியம் மற்றும் பிற முக்கிய செல்வந்தர்கள் மற்றும் சக்திவாய்ந்தநாடுகளில் பிரச்சாரம் செய்வதன் மூலம், தமிழீழம் பெற முடியும். இதையே பின்வரும் நாடுகள் பிரச்சாரம் செய்வதன் மூலம் வெற்றி பெற்றார்கள். அமெரிக்கா மற்றும் ஐரோப்பியஒன்றியத்தில் தாங்கள் ஒடுக்கப்பட்டவர்களிடமிருந்து முழுமையான பிரிவு பட பிரச்சாரம்செய்து வெற்றி பெற்றார்கள் : தென் சூடான், கிழக்கு திமோர், கொசோவா, போஸ்னியா …

புதிய அரசியலமைப்பை கொண்டு வருவதன் மூலம் ஸ்ரீலங்கா பல பெரிய வெற்றிகளை அடைய முடியும்.

1. இலங்கையில் இந்தியாவின் நெம்புகோல் 13 வது திருத்தம் மட்டுமே . புதிய அரசியலமைப்பு 13 வது திருத்தத்தை அகற்றும். இது தானாகவே இந்தியாவின் நெம்புகோல் தன்மையை குறைக்கும், மற்றும் இலங்கைக்கு இந்தியாவின் அச்சுறுத்தல் குறைக்கப்படும். இதனால், இந்தியாவின் ஈடுபாடு நீக்கப்படும்.

2. வடக்கு-கிழக்கு இணைப்பு 13 வது திருத்தத்தில் மட்டுமே உள்ளது. புதிய அரசியலமைப்பு, வடக்கு கிழக்கு இணைப்பின் இந்திய அதிகாரத்தை அகற்றுவது மட்டுமில்லாமல், வட-கிழக்கை இணைப்பு இல்லாமல் போய்விடும். இது எதிர்காலத்தில் கூட வடக்கு கிழக்கு சாத்தியமான இணைப்புக்கு தடை போடும்.

3. புதிய அரசியலமைப்பு, பிரதமர் மோடியினால் முன்மொழியப்பட்ட கூட்டுறவு-கூட்டாட்சி(Cooperative Federalism) க்கு ஒரு முடிவுகட்டும் . வட-கிழக்கு தமிழர்களுக்கு ஒரு நிரந்தரசுதந்திரமான , பாதுகாப்பான மற்றும் பாதுகாக்கப்பட்ட தமிழ் தாயகத்தை பெற்று கொடுப்பது இந்தியாவின் தார்மீக கடமை என தமிழர்கள் காலம் காலமாய் நம்புகிறார்கள். இதன் காரணமாக, இந்தியாவில் இருந்து கூட்டுறவு-கூட்டாச்சி பெறும் வாய்ப்பை இழக்க நேரிடும்.

4. ஐரோப்பிய ஒன்றியமும் அமெரிக்காவும் அரசியலமைப்பு மாற்றத்தை கட்டாயப்படுத்தியது. ஏனெனில் தமிழீழம் வேண்டுமென்ற தமிழர்களின் குரல்களை நிறுத்துவதன் காரணமாககூட்டாட்சி (சமஷ்டி)அரசியலமைப்பை ஐரோப்பிய ஒன்றியமும் அமெரிக்காவும் ஆதரிக்கிறது. இந்த பயனற்ற அரசியலமைப்பின் காரணமாக, ஒன்றும் இல்லாமல் முடிவடையும்.

5. எதிர்கால சர்வசன வாக்கெடுப்புக்கும் சில தடைகளை உருவாக்கும்.

நாம் ஒற்றையாட்சி அரசை ஏற்றுக் கொண்டால், அரசியல் தீர்வைப் பற்றி பேச்சுவார்த்தை எதுவும் எதிர்காலத்தில் இருக்காது. சிங்களவர்கள் சொல்வார்கள் இப்போது அரசியல் பிரச்சனை தீர்ந்து விட்டது என்று.

எனவே, இந்த தமிழரசுக் கட்சி பாராளுமன்ற உறுப்பினர்களிடம் சொல்லுங்கள், தமிழர்கள் எந்த அரசியல் அரசியலமைப்பு மாற்றங்களையும் ஆதரிக்க மாட்டார்கள் என்று.

அமெரிக்கா, ஐரோப்பிய ஒன்றியம், இந்தியா ஆகியவை புதிய அரசியலமைப்பு உருவாக்கத்தில்பங்கேற்க வேண்டும். நாங்கள் தமிழ் தேசியக் கூட்டமைப்பு மற்றும் சிங்கள மக்களை நம்புவதில்லை.

அரசியலமைப்பு மாற்றங்களில் போஸ்னிய பாணி கூட்டாட்சி என்பது நமக்குத் தேவை. போஸ்னிய பாணி கூட்டாட்சி என்பது அமெரிக்க மற்றும் பிற சக்திவாய்ந்த நாடுகளின் இனத்துவ யுத்தத்தைத் தவிர்க்க சமீபத்திய அரசியலமைப்பு அங்கீகாரம் ஆகும்.

போஸ்னியன் பாணி கூட்டாட்சி அறிமுகப்படுத்தப்படவில்லை என்றால், தமிழர்கள் தமிழீழம் தொடர்பான கோரிக்கையை திரும்பப் பெறுவார்கள் என்பது யதார்த்தம்.

Editor
Tamil Diaspora News
914 721-0505
email us here


Source: EIN Presswire

Attorney Patrick Megaro prevails in Appeal in 11th Circuit; lower court improperly granted immunity to police officer

Patrick Megaro, Criminal Defense Attorney, Clemency Petition for Corvain Cooper

Patrick Megaro, Criminal Defense Attorney, Clemency Petition for Corvain Cooper

Video of Appeals Attorney Patrick Megaro YouTube Video

Video of Appeals Attorney Patrick Megaro YouTube Video

Patrick Megaro, Attorney, on Today Exclusive Television

Patrick Megaro, Attorney, on Today Exclusive Television

Attorney Patrick Megaro on Fox News

Attorney Patrick Megaro on Fox News

Website of Patrick Megaro, Defense Lawyer

Website of Patrick Megaro, Defense Lawyer, Corvain Cooper Clemency Petition

Court of Appeals largely agreed with the arguments of attorney Patrick Megaro, that the police officer had no good reason (“probable cause”) to stop driver

Halscott Megaro PA (N/A:N/A)

… we support the police who are dedicated public servants sworn to protect public safety. For that we are truly grateful. However, everybody, even police officers, must follow the law …”

— Patrick Megaro, Defense Lawyer

ORLANDO, FLORIDA, UNITED STATES, August 3, 2018 /EINPresswire.com/ — Florida Criminal Defense Attorney Patrick Megaro prevailed on appeal in a case where a police officer stopped the vehicle of Mr. E.L. without justification. The Law Firm of Halscott Megaro PA announced that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit largely agreed with the arguments of Mr. Megaro, that the police officer had no good reason (“probable cause”) to stop E.L. The opinion of the three judges of the Court was unanimous (“per curiam”).

The underlying criminal case arose out of a traffic stop. According to the police officer’s testimony, E.L. was driving somewhat erratically, including multiple lane changes. When the officer stopped E.L., the testimony whether E.L. appeared intoxicated was contradictory.

The officer arrested E.L. for violating the Traffic Control Devices (changing lanes); for the violation Required Position and Method of Turning at Intersections (for turning into a middle lane instead of the nearest available lane); and finally, for Driving Under the Influence (DUI).

Later testing revealed that the client had 0.0% of blood alcohol concentration, and absolutely no drugs in his system. Despite the testing results, the police officer maintained that the client appeared to be intoxicated.

On behalf of his client, Megaro filed a 42 U.S.C. §1983 action (civil rights violations), claiming that this was a false arrest. In the trial court, the judge granted the police officer qualified immunity and thus summary judgment (a decision on the pleadings, without a formal trial).

Attorney Patrick Megaro appealed, and the Court agreed with the key arguments. On the issue of the multiple lane changes, the Court found that the applicable law does not prohibit such multiple lane changes, and it seems there were no solid yellow lane lines or solid double white lane lines. Thus, E.L.’s lane changes do not create a reason to arrest him. As to E.L.’s left turn into the middle instead of the nearest available lane, again the applicable law does not require that the turn be made to the extreme left hand lane lawfully available. There, based on the available information, the police officer did not have probable cause to stop and then arrest E.L.

Attorney Patrick Megaro comments: “First, let me say that we support the police who are dedicated public servants sworn to protect public safety. For that we are truly grateful. However, everybody, even police officers, must follow the law. We applaud the Court’s ruling that no reasonable police officer could have believed that my client’s conduct at the time of the stop was DUI.”

Mr. Megaro notes in particular that the police officer was “not entitled to qualified immunity on the false arrest claim …. because … no reasonable police officer could have believed that [E.L.]’s conduct at the time of the stop constituted driving under the influence.”

The Court send the case back to the trial court for a proceeding on the false arrest claim.

The underlying case is Llorente v. Demings, No. 17-14452 (11th Cir. 07/30/2018), see https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/9730427/Llorente_v_Demings_et_al

About Attorney Patrick Michael Megaro

Mr. Megaro is a native of New York where he played Division I college football and rugby at Hofstra University before graduating from Hofstra Law School. While at Hofstra Law, Mr. Megaro found his calling in life as a litigator and courtroom attorney. In law school, he interned at The Legal Aid Society in Queens, New York City and practiced criminal defense at the Criminal Justice Clinic at Hofstra Law School, representing real clients prior to graduation.

Patrick Megaro began his legal career at The Legal Aid Society Criminal Defense Division in Manhattan, New York City as a public defender. At Legal Aid, Mr. Megaro represented hundreds of clients charged with misdemeanors and major felony offenses, gaining invaluable trial experience fighting in court daily for the rights of clients in the area of criminal law. Mr. Megaro entered private practice as a criminal defense attorney in 2004 as an associate at a high-profile criminal defense law firm in New York City before forming his own firm in 2007. In private practice, Mr. Megaro represented clients in New York, New Jersey, Florida, and various Federal courts around the nation, concentrating on criminal trial defense, sentencing advocacy and mitigation, criminal appeals and post-conviction relief. In private practice he handled many high-profile criminal cases in New York City, earning a reputation as a fierce litigator in the area of criminal law. He continued to practice criminal law and appellate law in New York and New Jersey until 2014.

Since 2014, Mr. Megaro has been a partner at Halscott Megaro PA, based in Orlando, Florida, focusing in criminal defense, criminal appeals, post-conviction relief, and civil rights litigation. In his current position, he represents clients in legal appeals, post-conviction litigation, and at the trial court level. At the law firm of Halscott Megaro PA, Mr. Megaro joined forces with Orlando criminal defense attorney Jaime T. Halscott, Esq., bringing more than a decade of experience to Halscott Megaro PA in the area of criminal law. Website: https://www.appealslawgroup.com/our-attorneys/patrick-megaro-esq/

Patrick Megaro
Halscott Megaro, P.A.
(407) 255-2164
email us here

“Never Talk to the Police” by Patrick Megaro, Criminal Defense Attorney


Source: EIN Presswire

CCHR Calling for Ban on Torturous Electroconvulsive Therapy

Ban Electroshock (ECT) Device Being Used on Children, the Elderly and Vulnerable Patients

Ban Electroshock (ECT) Device Being Used on Children, the Elderly and Vulnerable Patients

CCHR Florida

The headquarters for CCHR Florida are located in downtown Clearwater

The headquarters for CCHR Florida are located in downtown Clearwater

Mental Health Watchdog calls upon the FDA to ban the ECT device from use after finding electroshock causes brain damage, memory loss and death.

ECT is brutality in the name of mental health care. The high death rate, severe memory loss, brain atrophy and damage ECT causes warrant it being banned under existing FDA law.”

— Diane Stein, President of CCHR Florida

CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, UNITED STATES, August 3, 2018 /EINPresswire.com/ — The mental health watchdog Citizens Commission on Human Rights (CCHR) of Florida announced its support of the nationwide movement to ban the use of electroshock treatment—the practice of sending up to 460 volts of electricity to the brain to “treat mental disorder”—stating that such a ban should be imminent in light of increasing reports of patients being damaged and deaths. Florida saw a 60% increase between 2015 and 2016 in the number of Medicaid recipients who were electroshocked while Texas, the only state to record deaths within 14 days of electroshock being administered, reported a death rate in recent years that represents an estimated 300 deaths nationally each year. The most frequent causes of death have been cardiac events and suicide, according to one study.

Jan Eastgate, president of CCHR International, said: “Electroshock is mental euthanasia, with a long history of being used for torture and abuse. Electric shock eradicates memory. It should never be condoned or permitted because quite apart from its inhuman aspects, patients consider it bluntly criminal, especially when forced on them. Psychiatrists and the FDA pass off electric shock machines as wonderful, even though they can kill patients.”

Electroshock’s brutal and sordid history ranges from its use in the slaughter of pigs, to painful “aversion therapy” on homosexuals, inflicting brain damage on those receiving ECT and torture.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has never obtained a single clinical trial from the manufacturers of the electroshock devices proving their safety and efficacy. Under Section 516 of the Food, Drug and Cosmetics Act the FDA has a duty to ban devices that present “substantial deception or unreasonable and substantial risk of illness or injury.” Electroshock, also called electroconvulsive therapy or ECT, can cause brain damage, long term memory loss and death, constituting more than a “substantial risk” and is far from safe and effective, according to thousands of survivors’ complaints. Ignoring these dangers, the FDA has instead limited bans under this Section to prohibiting the use of powdered gloves in medical or surgical procedures and prosthetic hair fiber implants that may trigger inflammation and hypersensitivity reactions, the latter FDA says were misrepresented in marketing as “safe, effective and causing little or no discomfort.”

“Despite evidence clearly demonstrating that there are substantial risks associated with the use of ECT, the FDA and APA continue to ignore the perils,” stated Diane Stein, President CCHR Florida. “One person being electroshocked is one too many and we are urging everyone to sign the petition to ban ECT”

The petition to ban ECT being used on children, the elderly and vulnerable patients has gained widespread support and stresses that in light of the fact that the FDA admits ECT can cause cardiovascular complications, memory loss, cognitive impairment, brain damage and death and that psychiatrists admit they do not know how ECT “works,” that the FDA should ban the electroshock (ECT) device from use.

Examples of brain damage and memory loss are all too abundant:

• In March 2016, a coroner from Sunderland County in the UK determined Elsie Tindle died after electroshock triggered an epileptic fit which caused irreparable brain damage.

• A 2012 study published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences reported a considerable “decrease in functional connectivity” between the prefrontal lobes of the brain and other parts of the brain after ECT. The most extensive long-term follow-up study indicates that “most ECT patients will never recover from the damage in the form of persistent severe mental deficits.”

• Austin, Texas, psychologist John Breeding, who heads the Coalition for the Abolition of Electroshock, said, “The bottom line is that ECT ‘works’ to the extent that it damages and disables the brain.” Breeding dispels psychiatric theories that the procedure is safer today than its “One Flew over the Cuckoo’s Nest” days in the 60s. He says that ECT has more potential for harm than ever. Much higher voltages are employed in the modern procedure because muscle relaxants and anesthetics raise the seizure threshold, with more electricity required to produce a seizure. The greater heat and electricity themselves cause more brain cell death, he says. He concludes “Given what we know about the resulting brain damage, I think this is a form of assault….”

• Leading ECT researcher and advocate, psychologist Harold Sackeim admitted in an editorial in The Journal of ECT that “virtually all patients experience some degree of persistent and, likely, permanent retrograde amnesia.” In a January 2007 study published in Neuropsychopharmacology, Sackeim and colleagues acknowledged that ECT may cause permanent amnesia and permanent deficits in cognitive abilities, which affect ability to function.

• In 2005, Santa Barbara Superior Court Judge Denise de Bellefeuille ruled that a psychiatrist and Santa Barbara psychiatric facility deceived its patients by failing to tell them that ECT causes irreversible memory loss. The psychiatrist (who had performed shock treatment for over 20 years), admitted that neither he nor anyone else understands how shock treatment works, and that the consent form Johnson provided to patients was “decidedly misleading in a critical regard,” concerning the permanency of memory loss.

Stein says, “To treat mental problems by electric shocks is brutality in the name of mental health care. The high death rate, severe memory loss, brain atrophy and damage ECT causes warrant it being banned under existing FDA law.”

To sign the petition to ban ECT please visit Ban Electroshock (ECT) Device Being Used on Children, the Elderly and Vulnerable Patients

About CCHR: Initially established by the Church of Scientology and renowned psychiatrist Dr. Thomas Szasz in 1969, CCHR’s mission is to eradicate abuses committed under the guise of mental health and enact patient and consumer protections. L. Ron Hubbard, founder of Scientology, first brought psychiatric imprisonment to wide public notice: “Thousands and thousands are seized without process of law, every week, over the ‘free world’ tortured, castrated, killed. All in the name of ‘mental health,’” he wrote in March 1969.

For source references click here.

Diane Stein
Citizens Commission on Human Rights of Florida
(727) 422-8820
email us here

Electroshock — Its Torture


Source: EIN Presswire

National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges Holds 81st Annual Conference

The NCJFCJ Is the Nation’s Oldest Judicial Membership Organization

The Hon. Katharine (Katie) Sullivan, Acting Director of the U.S. Department of Justice Office on Violence Against Women (OVW) delivered remarks at the NCJFCJ Conference

Addresses issues affecting juvenile justice, child welfare and family violence

The NCJFCJ is proud to be the leader in providing multi-disciplinary opportunities for judges and court professionals to convene and discuss the newest information affecting children and families.”

— Judge John J. Romero, Jr.

DENVER, COLORADO, UNITED STATES, August 2, 2018 /EINPresswire.com/ — (Denver, Colo.) – The National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges (NCJFCJ) recently held its 81st annual conference. This dynamic conference hosted more than 600 judicial officers and juvenile and family law related professionals from across the country in an informative consortium covering topics such as immigration and special immigrant juvenile status, the opioid epidemic, domestic child sex trafficking, child abuse and neglect, trauma-informed courts, domestic violence, LGBTQ youth and more.

Attendees convened to provoke and precipitate discussions about issues facing the juvenile and family court system. Plenary sessions included a keynote address on strategies for judges in a changing society related to generational shifts, community expectations and judicial roles by Lauran Stiller Rikleen, president of the Rikleen Institute for Strategic Leadership; the men’s role in stopping violence against women by Dr. Jackson Katz; and panel of trafficking and exploitation survivors led by Colorado leaders Judge Robert Lung; Jill Brogdon from the Colorado Human Trafficking Council; Mary Landerholm, from Colorado’s Human Trafficking Hotline; and Sara Nadelman from the Colorado Department of Human Services, Office of Children, Youth and Families.

The Hon. Katharine (Katie) Sullivan, Acting Director of the U.S. Department of Justice Office on Violence Against Women (OVW) also was in attendance and delivered remarks highlighting the 20-year partnership between OVW and the NCJFCJ and the importance of judicial leadership in communities.

“The NCJFCJ is proud to be the leader in providing unique multi-disciplinary opportunities for judges and court professionals to convene and discuss the newest information affecting children and families in our nation’s courts,” said Judge John J. Romero, Jr., NCJFCJ president. “At some point in a person’s life, one will be affected by an issue in juvenile or family court, whether it be directly or through a someone they know. It is important, now more than ever, for judges and court professionals to be educated and informed about the best practices, research and data available.”

The NCJFCJ also offered new educational opportunities to its participants including an experiential excursion to Happy Dog Ranch, a local nonprofit therapeutic horse rescue and sanctuary. Led by Dr. Rebecca Bailey, Transitioning Families, and Nina Ekholm Fry, director of equine programs at the University of Denver, judicial participants learned about different tools to alleviate stress; the importance of self-care and healing; and how equine therapy relates to the vulnerable children and families that come before them at the bench. A post-conference workshop was also offered on court and personal security taught by former U.S. Marshal John F. Muffler.

The 4th Annual Justice Innovation Awards were also held, recognizing the national Innovator of the Year and Impact of the Year recipients. The UNLV Immigration Clinic at the William S. Boyd School of Law received the Innovator of the Year award for their mission to offer law students real world experience providing pro bono deportation defense and as a community leader in protecting children and families in Nevada. Dr. Rebecca Nathanson, Associate Dean for Experiential Legal Education, UNLV William S. Boyd School of Law and Claudia Noriega-Bernstein, Marketing Director, Edward M. Bernstein & Associates were present to accept the award. The Impact of the Year Award was awarded to Judge Donna Schmalberger from Denver Juvenile Court and Judge Katherine Delgado from the Adams County District Court as pioneers for their work in establishing ICWA (Indian Child Welfare Act) Specialized Courts.

For more information on the NCJFCJ, visit http://www.ncjfcj.org.

About the National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges (NCJFCJ):
Founded in 1937, the Reno, Nev.-based National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges, is the nation’s oldest judicial membership organization and focused on improving the effectiveness of our nation’s juvenile and family courts. A leader in continuing education opportunities, research, and policy development in the field of juvenile and family justice, the 2,000-member organization is unique in providing practice-based resources to jurisdictions and communities nationwide.

Chrisie Yabu
KPS3
775-686-7437
email us here


Source: EIN Presswire

Antitrust Attorney K. Todd Wallace Starts Legal Blog and Commentary on Complex Antitrust and Trade-Related Legal Matters

Attorney Kenneth Todd Wallace in New Orleans

Attorney Kenneth Todd Wallace in New Orleans

Todd Wallace, Attorney of the Month, Attorney at Law Magazine

Todd Wallace, Attorney of the Month, Attorney at Law Magazine

Website of Law Firm Wallace Meyaski, K. Todd Wallace

Website of Law Firm Wallace Meyaski, K. Todd Wallace

Logo of Law Firm Wallace Meyaski, K. Todd Wallace

Logo of Law Firm Wallace Meyaski, K. Todd Wallace

Office of the law firm Wallace Meyaski (K Todd Wallace)

Office of the law firm Wallace Meyaski (K Todd Wallace)

Information on antitrust and trade law available on blog of lawyer Kenneth Todd Wallace; shares the experience gained in almost 20 years of antitrust practice

Wallace Meyaski LLC (N/A:N/A)

… As a legal practitioner, I am sharing the experience I have gained in almost 20 years of solving complex Antitrust Law issues …”

— K. Todd Wallace, antitrust lawyer

NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA, UNITED STATES, August 1, 2018 /EINPresswire.com/ — Kenneth Todd Wallace, a respected Antitrust Law attorney based in New Orleans, LA, announced today his new legal blog http://KToddWallaceBlog.blogspot.com/ which will focus primarily on complex legal issues in the area of Antitrust Law, unfair trade-related legal matters, and complex commercial litigation.

The experienced antitrust law attorney has launched this blog with legal commentary and analysis in this complex area of the law in response to his perceived void of commentary in this area, particularly in the Gulf South.

“With all the recent developments and complex summaries regarding the evolving nature of Antitrust Law, I felt that I could help simplify the real issues at hand for those impacted by this area of the law.” said Kenneth Todd Wallace. As a legal practitioner, I am sharing the experience I have gained in almost 20 years of solving complex Antitrust Law issues,” he added.

The Blog features legal analysis and commentary on precedential court decisions and the impacts of those decisions on businesses in a broad range of industries. It will also include legal commentary and updates on important regulatory developments.

About K. Todd Wallace

Kenneth Todd Wallace is an attorney and founding partner of the law firm Wallace Meyaski, LLC. He has nearly 20 years of experience in the legal and business professions with established excellence in trial advocacy, negotiation, strategic and initiative planning, antitrust and employment law compliance, government relations, mergers and acquisitions, and team building.

Law Firm Website: http://www.walmey.com/

Facebook page of the Law Firm: https://www.facebook.com/WallaceMeyaski/

LinkedIn Profile of Kenneth Todd Wallace: https://www.linkedin.com/in/todd-wallace-03895358/

Blog of Kenneth Todd Wallace: http://ktoddwallaceblog.blogspot.com/

K. Todd Wallace, Attorney at Law
Wallace Meyaski Law Firm
(504) 644-2011
email us here

Fox News Report “The evolution of America’s antitrust laws”


Source: EIN Presswire